Join our Masterclass: Sponsor License Application Guidance!
May 31
at 1:00 PM
Tax Deception Issue ILR PEO

ILR Tax Deception/Bad Character Issues, Client’s application approved at the UKVI Same Day Service

On March 05, 2018 | In Deception ILR | By A Y & J Solicitors

Recently, Applicants have faced issues receiving settlement following completing five continuous years in the UK as a Tier 1 (General) migrant. To qualify for the settlement, a Tier 1 (General) Migrant must be able to show that he/she has completed a continuous period of 5 years as a Tier 1 (General) and further be able to score 75 or 85 points under the PBS tier. Applicants must also be able to show that they have no criminal convictions, civil judgments against them, any issue of overstaying in the UK, nor that they are a person of bad character.

UKVI Uses HMRC Records to Allege Deception in ILR Application

Prior to December 2015, the Secretary of State did not consider the tax affairs of those Applicants on Tier 1 (General) Migrant visas, and most settlement applications were approved without further enquires. Just before 2016, many Applicants began to fear their applications for settlement would be retained at their Premium Service appointments and subsequently refused due to amendments made on their previous tax returns. The Secretary of State began to consider Applicants’ HMRC records in order to establish whether those Tier 1 (General) Applicants had declared their previous earnings accurately to HMRC. The Secretary of State was only concerned with the previous earnings declared at the time of each Tier 1 (General) application. Following verifications with HMRC, those Applicants who had tax amendments to correct the income initially declared to HMRC at the time of the submission of their self-assessment had their applications refused and received allegations of deception under Paragraph 322 (5) of the Immigration Rules.

A few months later, the Secretary of State implemented a new strategy of refusing those Applicants with tax issues. Questionnaires were issued under which most Applicants would fail, and this evidence was used against the Applicants throughout their legal battle as a self-declaration of their wrongdoing whenever initial income was incorrectly declared to HMRC.

Our Review Identifies Source of Errors in Tax amendments

A NON-EEA national, residing in the UK since September 2006 and working in the IT industry approached us to seek clarification on this matter. He needed to overcome the potential refusal and alleged deception or bad character due to tax amendments on two of his financial years. The financial years were crucial to his settlement application as they related to his previous earnings provided at the time of his initial Tier 1 (General) and extension applications. During the consultation, we learned that he had established a Limited company that was generating a yearly income of over £50,000. The error made on the initial submission of his tax return was made by his accountant due to an oversight, however, this explanation was not sufficient to secure our client’s ILR.

Successful Defence Grants Indefinite Leave to Remain on Same Day as Application

we instructed an independent tax advisory bureau to give an independent opinion on the current approach taken by HMRC with those taxpayers that fail to file their tax returns accurately at the stage of the initial submission.

Upon reviewing the evidence available to us and HMRC case law on tax amendments, we instructed an independent tax advisory bureau to give an independent opinion on the current approach taken by HMRC with those taxpayers that fail to file their tax returns accurately at the stage of the initial submission. This report, along with additional evidence obtained from the HMRC, our client’s accountant statement, and our detailed legal representations helped ensure the success of our client’s ILR application. During the entire process, we maintained regular contact with our client and his accountant to ensure that the explanation we provided satisfied the caseworker at the Home Office, and due to the inaccurate submission of our client’s tax returns were due to an error created by his accountant and he should not be penalised for trusting and relying on a professional’s advice.

At the UKVI Premium Service appointment, we were expecting our client to be served with a questionnaire in relation to his previous earnings. But a few hours later we were notified that his settlement application was approved, and our client received his grant of indefinite leave to remain without further enquires or a questionnaire being served.

With our expert help, our client and his family are now enjoying their settled status in the UK and their children were able to register as British citizens.

A Y & J Solicitors

A Y & J Solicitors is a multi-award winning, 14+ years experienced, recommended by Legal 500, boutique UK immigration law firm based in Central London. Having assisted 5000+ clients, we are well equipped to help you with our ‘In It To Win It’ approach. For your assurance and confidence, we are pleased to share our trust rating of 4.9/5 based on 1000+ reviews on Trustpilot & Google.

An Overview of Indefinite Leave to Remain ILR Requirements

Floating CTA